PSA: Ladies Beware - Kenneth E. Gardner Likes Young Girls, REALLY Young Girls

Lighten up Brooks. All I am saying is that I found this article well written. I was complimenting the author. Nothing more. Why this bothers you is your problem.

I am following the Kimberlin/Rauhauser story. That means I am reading all articles I find on it. I occasionally comment on something I have read about it. I am following the story even to sites with personalities I do not agree with.

I’ll refrain from commenting on any further articles published here since that seems to bother you so much.

In closing I’ll repeat myself. Lighten up Brooks. Remember: Principles, not Personalities.

Why does what I think about you vs Patterico & Stranahan matter to you so much? Since you went through my history I am surprised you didn’t use one of the tweets where I compared the Trenches to National Enquirer. I’m pretty sure I said that once to Stranahan. I know I said it to Stevie J. West. That doesn’t mean I am not going to read what is written about the story I am interested in.

Again, I was just complimenting the author…you had nothing to do with it. Even the National Enquirer gets a story right every once in awhile. It says more about Matt Hogan’s ability to write a story than it does about the publication for which he wrote it for.
I think it is stupid that you were wasting your time arguing with Stranahan and Patterico. I had never heard of you before a couple weeks ago, while I have read Patterico for a long time, and Stranahan since he first did a Pigford story. So they have built up credibility, while you seem to be a newcomer with delusions of grandeur. You must have a massive ego if what I say, some faceless no body in the crowd, makes you get all defensive because I comment on a story on the site. Why do you care what I think about the fighting between you and others? What does it matter who I think is right or wrong?
The only reason you have for being a jerk to me is because I chose the other personalities over you. Again, lighten up Brooks.

some facts for you, johnny-come-lately. i’ve been an activist for over 20 years, i was one of the founders of the national tea party movement - i was on the very first call which launched the damned thing. i’ve also been right there on twitter for over five years (longer than 99+% of the people who follow around like a lapdog), and two of those 5 years i had strandedhan blocked for being a lying leftist. now he’s just a lying non-leftist that andrew (yes, i knew andrew irl too. he was merely an acquaintance, but we did speak occasionally.) vouched for. unfortunately, andrew’s vouching had me fooled too when i gave strandedhan another chance to prove himself. my first-hand dealings are quite different, and it’s clear that andrew didn’t vet the dumb toothless bastard. ask lee about his lies regarding our source. remember, he said he was never asked to stand down from interacting with our source. we proved that was a flat-out lie. then his story changed, and i think it changed again, but, that’s typical of strandedhan.

as far as swatterico, he’s been proven to be another mangler of truth, who is also a “former” (?) leftist, and who just happens to be married to a leftist. ask him about that. also, ask him why, as a non-breitbart employee, he has confidential email that were sent to andrew breitbart from actual conservatives and distributed by people who, at that time, had never described themselves as conservative publicly. then ask him why he tried to deny VERY publicly being in receipt of said email even after he’s told 6 people (mike stack and 5 members of our team, including the author of this piece) otherwise on the phone.

you might wanna do some actual research about people before you go and pin your hopes and dreams on them, fanboy. personally, i think you’re a sock. why? no one has ever heard of you. name one person in the movement who knows you irl that will vouch for you. go on. we’ll wait here for you to provide a known entity in the movement who will vouch for you.