Behold: Neocon Echo Chamber Weighs In On Rand Paul’s Filibuster

Clear divisions in sociopolitical paradigms can be seen on any given day in the “conservative” collective. Let’s have a look at the neocon echo chamber’s response to Rand Paul’s momentous and founder-inspired filibuster which marched on for nearly 13 hours.

Kenneth Gardner represents the typical neocon who incorrectly claims to be “conserving” America’s founding principles by self-identifying as a conservative, but obviously hasn’t read, or doesn’t understand, our founders on foreign policy also laid out in Federalist Papers 2-5. Ken had this anti-founding-principles Tweet to share with the class.

Notice the Code Pink logical fallacy where Ken tries to equate Rand Paul with Code Pink. And this guy is an attorney, or used to be attorney. Not sure what his current status is.

The following is from Kevin Eder, the kid who gave Mitt Romney lap dances for over a year.

There’s that persecution complex poking out, Eder. (He’s Jewish.) Apparently, Keder and his cronies think Rand owes a certain foreign government some sort of allegiance. But, it was George Washington who said, “history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.”

The kid who sodomized idolized Romney over and over and over during the 2012 election cycle is concerned about “hero worship” of Rand Paul. Ironical.

We can’t recall such an impactful filibuster in our lifetimes, but the man with no name can’t muster much regarding Rand’s historic event.

Oh wait, he can muster something. Here’s a gripping assessment.

Aw, more of that persecution complex rearing its ugly head from the editor of Commentary Magazine. (You’ll remember him from a previous piece of ours.)

John wants to make sure that his people don’t “underestimate” Rand Paul. He means this in an adversarial context.

Because John doesn’t admire Rand, after all.

Michelle Malkin whines. (This is covered in more detail here.)

First, Allen Ginzburg doesn’t have a problem with Rand’s views, but instead has a problem with people who he surmises don’t know what Rand’s views are.

Hold up. Now Ginzburg says that he’s got a problem with 20% of Rand’s views. Which 20% would that be? How does one quantify 20% of someone’s views? If we could play this quantification game, we’d say that Rand’s views are 100% closer to our founding principles, especially with regard to foreign policy, than the views of Ginzburg and his pals.

There’s another Code Pink reference in relation to Rand’s filibuster. Logical fallacy seems to be a popular response in the neocon echo chamber.

Loesch insists that his fellow neocons should encourage “them” when they do good. Them? As in people like Rand Paul who support America’s founding principles?

Rush Limbaugh’s brother David chimes in. He’s flummoxed. He didn’t even know Rand’s Twitter handle before last night. That’s right, a “conservative” sibling of Rush didn’t know the Twitter handle of arguably one of America’s most conservative senators. David, remember that conservatism in America means one is “conserving” our founding principles.

Having been exposed to Rand’s words, David finds that the filibuster is “invigorating”. Imagine how invigorated David would be every day if he followed Rand and other people on Twitter who supported America’s founding principles rather than the aforementioned that he back-scratches. Perhaps David is having a neoconservative existential crisis after drinking from Rand’s filibuster firehose of liberty. Sounds romantic.

At least we were able to find a solitary glimmer of hope for liberty in the midst of all that globalist interventionism, victimology-based self-entitlement parading as “commitment” to specific foreign nations, and Jingoistic Christian end-times messianic paranoia only allowed to reveal itself publicly as “concern”. David Limbaugh’s “invigorating” was the most positive comment the neocon echo chamber could muster in response to this historical occasion. We’ll keep an eye on him.

About Brooks Bayne

Bacon and bourbon.

, , , , ,