Kinky Cannon’s (@toddkincannon) Perverted Pattern Solidifies, As Girls #4 & #5 Step Forward – Alleging Criminal Unsolicited “Dick Pics”
What sort of “conservative” sends unsolicited dick pics to women he meets through Twitter then attacks them if such advances are rejected? Let’s discuss the latest allegations from 2 more women.
What Kincannon looks like. His Twitter avatar is many years out of date. Buyer beware, ladies! This is a screencap of a local TV station’s segment with him. Chris Farley’s “Fat guy, little coat” comes to mind.
It takes a special breed of goon to pull a snub-nosed Derringer on an unsuspecting single mother, especially from several states away. But we’ve already detailed, quite extensively, just how “special” the goon in question has proven himself to be. And others have noticed, as well.
But now we have another scab to peel from the gaping wound inflicted on the conservative movement by the SCGOP “superstar”. Namely, why would this proven pervert send pictures of his trinket unsolicited to a well-regarded Twitter mainstay (a source who has asked for anonymity-which we will honor), as she claims below?
Women 1-3 (and there are at least half a dozen others, allegedly) were relatively unknown in the conservative Twittersphere, and there were stipulations of quid pro quo, in those cases.
Did our protected source reciprocate? We have no way of knowing for sure, but we do know that, solicited or not, Todd’s penchant for dick pic dissemination is a Class C misdemeanor, under her state law, (and South Carolina, too, come to think of it.)
South Carolina’s relevant statute:
SECTION 16-17-430. Unlawful communication.
(A) It is unlawful for a person to:
(1) use in a telephonic communication or any other electronic means, any words or language of a profane, vulgar, lewd, lascivious, or an indecent nature, or to communicate or convey by telephonic or other electronic means an obscene, vulgar, indecent, profane, suggestive, or immoral message to another person;
Oops. You’d think a member of the South Carolina Bar (for now) would know his own state’s laws. But, maybe he was too busy sexting and tweeting to “bone up” on the law? And doesn’t that statute make about 85% of his Twitter feed misdemeanors, as well? Damn.
Also, the SC Bar seems to frown upon this sort of behavior:
“5. Improper conduct on the part of an attorney by violating the civil or criminal laws. This includes willful misrepresentation, fraud, deceit, bribery, extortion, misappropriation, theft, conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit a “serious crime”, and crimes involving moral turpitude.”
Anyone care to follow up with them about this guy? Perhaps he could use some moral turpentine? Administered rectally.
Anyway, we also know this victim, Girl #4, denied Todd’s request for a threesome, and was later vilified for it. Her description of his request, after she’d already said “No, thanks.”?
He went on about what he and his fiancee would do to me and sent me a photo on the phone.
That’s what we (and the relevant laws) would call “unsolicited,” folks. Girl #4 continues her allegations publicly on Twitter:
Also of note, we have the following tidbit from Girl #5 (also a real life known entity and somewhat popular on Twitter), who wishes to remain unnamed:
“[He wanted me to come to South Carolina to] hang out with him & his fiance. He was intrigued by me. Also think his fiance is a little bi… Did I go to SC? I am not into threesomes at all.”
Hell, with that moose knuckle and thunder thighs, just you and him would count as a threesome. Be careful, ladies. Some people tend to use their most flattering (sometimes decade-old) pics for Twitter avatars. We’re sure Todd was “intrigued” by your huge boobs, Girl #5. He hasn’t shown the propensity to be intrigued by anything of real value when it comes to women.
It should be pointed out here that this same type of exchange with Todd has been confirmed by 3 other women (Girls #6-8), none of whom have actually had contact with this mysterious fiance. Mysterious, we say, because what kind of engaged couple only has two pictures taken together, that we know of, and they are actually pictures of… framed pictures? Manti Te’o and (what was “her” name?) didn’t have any pictures together, come to think of it. But the whole damn world thought they were getting married.
It just strikes us as odd that, according to Todd’s Twitter timeline, they got engaged in December of 2011, after meeting that May. Ashely joins instagram in September 2012 and immediately posts a picture of the engagement ring (which is almost a year old, by that point). Then, in October, she posts a picture of a framed picture and tags it as “Our first family photo!” Do what? A year and a half together (and engaged) without a photo together? Doesn’t add up.
Hmm… Some people call that a “beard”.
But, if Ashely is actually Todd’s fiance, how many years of “wedded bliss” can she honestly expect, knowing that she was dangled like a piece of meat in front of half a dozen women (and likely countless others) on Twitter and elsewhere for threesomes? Does that kind of behavior really end when a man says “I do”? Is Ashely down with the girl-on-girl-on-guy or guy-on-girl… (No, that’d suffocate the girl.) Well, you get the point. Consenting adults can do what they please, I suppose, but that path generally leads to heartache and turmoil. And that’s apart from the possible misdemeanors already committed.
Most people would have difficulty believing a woman would be foolish enough to marry an overweight pervert 12 years older than her with no respect for women. But, if she is foolish enough to do so, we can only imagine that she’s a real peach too. It’s entirely possible that Kinky Cannon’s fiance lusts for the women that he’s trying to lure to South Carolina and encourages his deviant behavior, but that would make her a deviant too. The mind reels from considering such a lovely couple. Oh, the legacy left to such lineaged progeny should any spring forth from the moose-knuckled loins of deviants.
Beyond all that, why is a “conservative” engaging in practices that fit none of our principles? And why does a lawyer flaunt and scoff at the law? (OK, that one’s not so hard to believe.)
Despite the size of Todd’s naughty bits, the issue goes far deeper than creepy lewd images, flung far and wide across various electronic communication mediums. It boils down to personal responsibility (which is a conservative tenet, after all).
Yes, Todd (or can we call him Toad?), never addresses his internet behavior, assuming he can swallow such allegations with hashtags like #TDGN, a network he set up (and raised money for) under the auspices that his followers spam block people he disagrees with. When Todd was challenged by one of his unwilling recipients of his dick pics, as to how much money, and under what premise Todd raised #TDGN money over, he blithely dismissed this person and went out on a campaign of public humiliation on Twitter, to damage an already fragile person further.
Todd also does all of this during his working hours. Interesting, isn’t it? His practice’s website states explicitly that he doesn’t charge by the hour, so that he can bring you the most efficient legal representation possible. Does Toad have no clients, or a lot of down time?
Hmm. Maybe both. He averages 650 tweets a day according to Tweetstats. Based on a 10 hour day, that’s more than a tweet every minute, every hour, for 10 full hours! Tell us what sort of attention could be paid to clients with that sort of zeal and determination paid elsewhere. If you’re a legal client of Kincannon’s and you’ve felt that he’s been inattentive to your paying needs since he has started his Twitter escapades, the Tweetstat summary will help you understand why.
In addition, Todd has somehow achieved prominence in the Republican Party, bragging he’s represented both prominent members of SCGOP and presidential candidates alike. That is curious, isn’t it? This is the same Republican Party that wanted Clinton’s head on a stick for similar behavior? Is Todd convenient or is it okay for the party who claims the “moral upper hand” to employ men of deplorable behavior to champion a message? Is it “no matter how wrong he is, he still champions my views?” I find that a tad callous.
I suppose the question is: “How does Todd function at this capacity without scrutiny?” Scrutiny from the South Carolina Bar Association, scrutiny from the Republican Party, nor scrutiny from his followers? If Todd is truly a rising star, how is what he did (or continues to do) not on the radar of “conservatives” or the Republican Party itself?
Clinton was hanged, in the court of public opinion, by Republicans who blasted him for his behavior. Does anyone think, for a minute, that Kincannon would not throw an election if (God forbid) he was a staff worker? (We would hope young Teddy steers clear of legal services from a man of such compromised character.)
Todd is actually the epitome of what is wrong with conservatives, and why we don’t win elections. He’s not moral. He has no values, and Todd, evidently, finds nothing wrong with his conduct.
In addition, hometown “conservative” hero, Andrew Breitbart, made official Anthony Weiner’s proclivity to do about the same as Todd Kincannon is doing right now. It was celebrated as huge news in the conservosphere that Andrew Breitbart leaked the immoral behavior of Anthony Weiner (and rightly so) which led him to resign. However, it appears as if Slurpee/Margarita brain freeze has paralyzed Todd Kincannon’s brain dead partisan fans into believing that Todd’s behavior is somehow different from any of the aforementioned losers. Todd is, indeed, one of those losers. Hypocritical even:
Apparently his followers (of which there are many, but, hey, look how many albums Ricky Martin sold, right?) come to the same conclusion. Todd’s reprehensible behavior seems to be condoned by the sad sacks that think Twitter followers amount to anything. Is this really what partisan discussion has come down to?
Is this what the modern face of conservatism is? If so, I hope we are prepared to lose for the next two decades. Todd exhibits about the same moral fortitude of Larry Flynt, with the candor and mouth to match.
So, an additional question to these would be lemmings, following Todd’s every tweet, “do you care that Todd is an asshole?” Todd makes advances to women on Twitter, and sends pictures (unsolicited, in some cases) of his humiliatingly small penis. That, in and of itself, is a source of pity. However, (and I know we are all adults with sex lives, and Todd is certainly entitled to his hedonism in the right circles) Todd is not just a person out there looking for a threesome. Todd is a vindictive prick who can’t just let it go when people reject him for being a physically repulsive wildebeest.
Unfortunately for Todd, his fiancé is not a sell. He’s in the wrong market, it appears. When I was a young man, raised by an honorable mother, I was told that if my advances were not warranted to move on. Just good advice all around. Unfortunately, Todd seems to think that if he petitions you for his imaginary threesomes, you have no choice but to accept, or suffer his wrath. Only a tiny dick, no-mannered, disgusting and petty man would seek revenge for being rejected on Twitter.
Todd explains his Twitter style as “I’ll tweet something inflammatory or borderline crazy sounding [it's just for fun]” to get a rise out of people. Todd seems to make his way in life tweeting about dead people who can’t talk back or emotionally damaged women who betray his deviant advances. Listen to this interview as Kincannon stutters and stammers while doubling-down on stupid. Imagine if this guy was your attorney.
Well, let’s give Todd some of the same. Todd is a sexual deviant, who, due to his repulsive physical appearance and lack of endowment, couldn’t pay for a threesome with all of the #TDGN fundraising in the Twittersphere. Todd is probably the most tiny dick, physically repulsive sack of feces who ever was unfortunately birthed and not even a paid maid would say otherwise. His very existence is in infamy, and I doubt there will be a person (aside from his mother – if she can even find it in her heart to not denounce Todd’s unfortunate creation) to stand steadfast at Todd’s grave. Todd is not a man. He’s a mouse who picks on damaged females, and if he doesn’t get his way, he ruins them on Twitter.
Todd, pick on someone your own size. Not dead black kids (with mourning parents) or emotionally damaged women who just can’t bring themselves to be attracted to you, even with your now disgraced prominence in the GOP. To put it bluntly, you are so physically and mentally repulsive that women don’t want to be in your presence. You’re just a fat man that can’t even troll Twitter to satiate your sexual deviancy and lack of moral values.
Besides victims four and five, there are more. If anyone else would like to step forward, without fear of reprisal from a tiny dick coward, trust that The Trenches will give you a voice. This is a clarion call to all victims out there, that there is no reason to fear a fat, tiny dick loser like Kincannon, and step forward with your story. We do not believe chivalry is dead, and trust The Trenches to protect those that are in fear.
In closing, Todd, I will leave you with a quote from one of our founding fathers, who didn’t need a threesome to bust a nut. Real men do not display the type of cowardice that you are now infamous for. We’re sure you’ll eventually get what you deserve. People usually do. Thank you for the lulz, sinner.
“Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.” – George Washington
