Trevino’s No Good, Very Bad Day

trevinobiojpg

 

The lulz are thick today, with the revelation that a true “son” of Texas, and one, as you can see above, who would “never forsake Texas or her cause”,  was part of an elaborate messaging campaign on behalf of the oppressive Malaysian government.

From the above linked article from Buzzfeed :

A range of mainstream American publications printed paid propaganda for the government of Malaysia, much of it focused on the campaign against a pro-democracy figure there.

The payments to conservative American opinion writers — whose work appeared in outlets from the Huffington Post and San Francisco Examiner to the Washington Times to National Review and RedState — emerged in a filing this week to the Department of Justice. The filing under the Foreign Agent Registration Act outlines a campaign spanning May 2008 to April 2011 and led by Joshua Trevino, a conservative pundit, who received $389,724.70 under the contract and paid smaller sums to a series of conservative writers.

And more :

According to Trevino’s belated federal filing, the interests paying Trevino were in fact the government of Malaysia, “its ruling party, or interests closely aligned with either.”

Also in that article, Trevino attempts to defend his position, as do a few others he apparently roped into this strange scheme. Most of their time and effort seemed to be aimed at discrediting an opposition leader named Anwar Ibrahim. Credited as being the only seeming hope for democracy in Malaysia, Ibrahim has faced, according to media reports, an unfair prosecution over sodomy charges, charges which, as the Buzzfeed article noted, Trevino defended.

Good times.

Curiously enough, Trevino truly seemed to be defending a government full of hateful anti-Semites, an irony that’s not lost on those of us here at The Trenches. (Remember that time when Trevino attacked Trenches founder Brooks Bayne as a virulent anti-semite for using the word Jew a handful of times in a post that was over 1,000 words long?) Well, let’s see what some sources have to say about Malaysia’s ruling government:

In Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, politicians and civil servants devote a surprising amount of time to thinking about Israel, 7,612 km away. Sometimes they appear to be obsessed by it. Malaysia has never had a dispute with Israel, but the government encourages the citizens to hate Israel and also to hate Jews whether they are Israelis or not.

Few Malaysians have laid eyes on a Jew; the tiny Jewish community emigrated decades ago. Nevertheless, Malaysia has become an example of a phenomenon called “Anti-Semitism without Jews.” Last March, for instance, the Federal Territory Islamic Affairs Department sent out an official sermon to be read in all mosques, stating that “Muslims must understand Jews are the main enemy to Muslims as proven by their egotistical behaviour and murders performed by them.” About 60% of Malaysians are Muslim.

In Kuala Lumpur, it’s routine to blame the Jews for everything from economic failures to the bad press Malaysia gets in foreign (“Jewish-owned”) newspapers.

The leaders of the country assume that Jews and Israelis deserve to be humiliated as often as possible. In 1984, the New York Philharmonic cancelled a visit because the Malaysian information minister demanded that a composition by Ernest Bloch, an American Jewish composer who died in 1959, be eliminated from their program. In 1992, an Israeli football player with the Liverpool team was refused permission to play in Malaysia; the team cancelled the visit. The government banned Schindler’s List, calling it anti-German and pro-Jewish propaganda. The same government later decided it could be shown if seven scenes were cut. Steven Spielberg refused, so the government removed all his films from Malaysia’s screens.

Now, I don’t know about you, but that’s about the most stinging criticism of a government I can remember reading in quite some time. Also, let’s do just some basic reasoning: Getting paid to write puff pieces about a government that’s virulently anti-Semitic means one, by proxy, is anti-Semitic, no? As opposed to using the word “jew” a handful of times in an extensive piece regarding the intersection of Judaism and Socialism in America.

But, yannow, smart-set conservatism for the win!

While we’re at it, we figured we’d share some tweets that have started rolling in since this delicious little story broke earlier today.

This last tweet is the winner.

Hate us all you want for pointing out the flaws on the right. But, to put it bluntly, we’re sick of the intellectual dishonesty that seems to run so rampant for the aforementioned smart-set. Not only does this man try to claim the great state of Texas’ history as his own, he also claims to be a conservative. Not sure where in the definition of “conservatism” it says “actively shills for a foreign Muslim government and lies about it on the record… TWICE,” but if that’s changed, let us know!

Bellum Letale.

 

, , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/Xcitizen10 01uǝzıʇıɔx

    Reporting ethics go to the highest bidder? This is the party with the “moral upper hand”.

  • kimvy

    It’s nice when the karma train stops by.

  • http://twitter.com/DavidMcnabb1 David F’n McNabb™

    OMG. The guy that continually accuses Brooks Bayne of antisemitism without much proof, has been taking money from Islamists to perpetrate what amounts to an antisemetic propaganda? LuuuuuuuLLLLLZZZZ!

  • http://twitter.com/DavidMcnabb1 David F’n McNabb™

    did I say “without much proof?” What I meant was “absolutely no proof whatsoever.”

  • http://thegraph.com/ Ben Froland

    We knew the faux conservatives had a price, we just thought it would be in American dollars.

  • Melissa Brewer

    Wow… Just wow. I’ve noticed this hateful guy going after you, a friend had told me in the past that he was super racist. Isn’t Malaysia a place where terrorism breeds? Wow.

  • http://twitter.com/lesterhalfjr Chris Hadrick

    I had two interactions with him on twitter, both left me very underwhelmed. The first was during last year’s CPAC. Like all wanna be journos he was making fun of Ron Paul. I don’t care if people don’t like Ron Paul but there’s a way certain people do it that is just so beltway and annoying. I think he was sold on Donald Trump or something I can’t remember. I was like “do you think the tea party is relevant” and he paid lip service to that. How about Rand Paul? He was like sure. I was like so Rand is totally cool and his father, who he agrees with on most stuff, is a nut?

    Again, it had nothing to do with Ron Paul, it was his smug attitude.

    Then later he was trying to sort of teach a class or something about the Civil War and he basically said anyone who thought it was anything other than what was in the history books was “marginal”. I was like “Who are you to say what is marginal?” I’m a libertarian, I don’t care for Lincoln and more to the point the money issues with cotton and everything is hugely relevant. We went back and forth and eventually he blocked me.

    I realize this is boring as hell but sufficet to say the guy seems to really see himself as a big deal and part of things in the pundit world. “snark” is the what they call it i believe.

    In his quasi defense, I can’t recall reading anything about Malaysia so he was a pretty bad propagandist if he was one.